AI vs Search: The Traffic Wars You Can’t Ignore

Track Your Brand in AI Search

Click Raven shows how often ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI mention your brand.

Inside the app you can:

✅ Benchmark against competitors
✅ Track 15–300 prompts/keywords
✅ See visibility trends over time
✅ Get weekly email reports with insights

Don’t let AI ignore you. Make sure you’re the brand customers see.

👉 Plans start at just $19/mo to track 15 prompts across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode.

AI vs Search: Who’s Winning the Traffic Wars?

The Ahrefs-coded dashboard at ChatGPT-vs-Google.com just gave us a fresh look at how search traffic is shifting and the results are spicy.

• Google still rules the jungle with 41% of all referral traffic… but even the giant stumbled, down -4.8% in August.

• ChatGPT is quietly climbing: now at 0.21% traffic share with +5.5% MoM growth. That’s still tiny, but the trendline is undeniable.

• Perplexity’s holding momentum at +7.9% MoM, while Claude (-10.1%) and Gemini (-13.2%) are slipping hard.

• Mistral face-planted with a brutal -48.6% drop in August.

Why it matters:
We’re watching consolidation in real time. Traditional search is slowing, AI search is still embryonic but growing fast, and only a few players (ChatGPT, Perplexity) are showing staying power. For marketers, the takeaway is clear:

👉 Play defense on SEO (retention + UX) while experimenting offensively with AI visibility, especially in ChatGPT, which is emerging as the only real non-Google growth curve.

The next year isn’t about “Google or AI.” It’s about hedging across both before AI eats a bigger slice of the pie.

AI Adoption Soars, But Search Isn’t Dead

Rand Fishkin’s latest research with Datos shows 20% of Americans are now heavy AI tool users (10+ times a month) and nearly 40% use at least one AI tool monthly. Sounds massive, right?

Here’s the twist: 95% of Americans still use traditional search engines every month, and heavy Google usage actually rose from 84% in 2023 to 87% in 2025. Even more telling, Datos + Semrush found that when people start using ChatGPT, their Google searches increase and stay higher months later.

So AI isn’t cannibalizing search. It’s fueling it. The media narrative of “AI vs Google” doesn’t match the data. Instead, AI tools are expanding overall search behavior, not replacing it.

👉 Takeaway for marketers: Treat AI as an amplifier, not a substitute. Winning visibility means showing up in both AI results and search engines, because users are bouncing between the two more than ever.

Create How-to Videos in Seconds with AI

Stop wasting time on repetitive explanations. Guidde’s AI creates stunning video guides in seconds—11x faster.

• Turn boring docs into visual masterpieces

• Save hours with AI-powered automation

• Share or embed your guide anywhere

How it works: Click capture on the browser extension, and Guidde auto-generates step-by-step video guides with visuals, voiceover, and a call to action.

Best part? It’s 100% free.

👉 Download the extension now

AI Platforms Disagree 62% of the Time. That’s Your Opportunity

New BrightEdge research shows Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, and ChatGPT recommend different brands nearly 62% of the time. In fact, only 1 in 3 queries surface the same brands across all three platforms.

• Google AI Overviews (AIO): Loves breadth — averages 6+ brand mentions per query.

• ChatGPT: Plays favorites — cites trusted brands 2.5x less often but leans on what’s baked into its training data.

• Google AI Mode: Super picky — cites the fewest brands, but those it picks get heavy authority backing.

Why it matters: This isn’t chaos, it’s a chance. BrightEdge calls it the “citation network effect” — land visibility on one AI surface, and it can ripple into the others.

👉 Playbook:

• Use high-commercial-intent keywords (“buy,” “best,” “deals”) — they trigger brand mentions in ~65% of cases.

• Build brand recognition (so ChatGPT “remembers” you).

• Go broad in AIO for multiple mentions.

• Leverage third-party validation to break into AI Mode.

Bottom line: The 62% disagreement gap isn’t bad news. It’s more paths to visibility. Brands that learn to play to each AI’s quirks will own the next wave of discovery.

ChatGPT Scrapes Google… But Doesn’t Play by Google’s Rules

Ahrefs’ latest study confirms it: ChatGPT scrapes Google results — but the overlap is shockingly low.

• For short-tail queries, only 10% of ChatGPT’s citations match Google’s top 10.

• Perplexity? A whopping 65% match with Google’s top 10 — basically a citation-first mirror of the SERPs.

• ChatGPT prefers domains over pages, citing ranking domains 3x more often than the exact URLs Google ranks.

Why it matters: Ranking top 10 in Google doesn’t guarantee you a spot in ChatGPT. The AI applies its own re-ranking layer, reshuffling which pages get cited. That means cluster content and broad domain authority matter more than ever.

👉 Takeaway: Optimize for both surfaces. SEO alone won’t guarantee AI citations, but building authority across multiple pages and mentions gives you a fighting chance to win in both Google and AI answers.

SEO vs. GEO: Same Game, New Rules

Ahrefs just laid out the 5 key differences between SEO (Search Engine Optimization) and GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) — and it’s a must-read if you care about AI search.

• SEO = clicks. GEO = mentions. Google gives you a blue link, ChatGPT drops your brand in its answer.

• SEO measures traffic. GEO measures visibility. You might never see the click, but the brand impression still lands.

• SEO is your site. GEO is everywhere. AI leans on third-party sites (reviews, Reddit, “best of” lists) way more than your own pages.

• SEO traffic browses. GEO traffic converts. Ahrefs’ own data: AI search traffic was only 0.5% of visits, but drove 12%+ of signups (23x conversion rates).

The bottom line: SEO is the foundation; GEO is the future-proof layer. One drives volume, the other drives trust and intent. Ignore GEO, and your competitors will own the AI answers while you wait for clicks that never come.

👉 Start with SEO. Layer in GEO. Win both the link and the mention.

How 433 Investors Unlocked 400X Return Potential

Institutional investors back startups to unlock outsized returns. Regular investors have to wait. But not anymore. Thanks to regulatory updates, some companies are doing things differently.

Take Revolut. In 2016, 433 regular people invested an average of $2,730. Today? They got a 400X buyout offer from the company, as Revolut’s valuation increased 89,900% in the same timeframe.

No wonder 10K+ everyday people are taking the chance on Pacaso.

Founded by a former Zillow exec, Pacaso’s co-ownership tech reshapes the $1.3T vacation home market. They’ve earned $110M+ in gross profit to date, including 41% YoY growth in 2024 alone. They even reserved the Nasdaq ticker PCSO.

The same institutional investors behind Uber, Venmo, and eBay backed Pacaso. And you can join them. But not for long. Pacaso’s investment opportunity ends September 18.

Invest While You Still Can

_{Paid advertisement for Pacaso’s Regulation A offering. Read the offering circular at invest.pacaso.com. Reserving a ticker symbol is not a guarantee that the company will go public. Listing on the NASDAQ is subject to approvals.}